Freedom to Report Real News
Tuesday, March 29, 2005
Home/News ·  Public Records  ·  Subscribe  ·  Research Requests  ·  Help Us Survive  ·  Contact Us

Legislative Hearing Notices

Calendar of Events

News & Editorial:
Monthly Archives
Now in Hawaii
Outside Hawaii
Banana Peel: Investigative News
Small Business Focus
Government Watch
Rotten or Sweet Apple? Hawaii Education Beat
Economic Blues & Booms
Success Stories
Heroes & Scoundrels
Media Mania
Grapevine
High Tech Clues: Ask Alan
Making a Difference
Lame Law of the Week
It's Your Money
Boosting Your Business Success
Emotional Well-being Q & A: ... Dr. Gelb Says
News & Editorials Archive
Calendar of Events
Disinformation Station
VOTE 2004

Perspective:
Blonde Uprising
Letters to the Editor
Guest Editorials
Grassroot Perspective
The Jonathan Gullible Series
Getting & Giving Archive
Battle of Ideas
Potholes in Paradise
A Fresh Perspective
An American Entreprenuer in Asia
Prometheus Rebounds - A Free Market Novel
Hawaii Reporter Bulletin Board

Got Tips?
Anonymous Tips

Stay Ahead:
Links to Favorite Sites


Clean Elections Gives Candidates the Opportunity to Conduct Credible Campaigns
By Barbara Lubin, 3/22/2005 8:32:44 PM

EDITOR'S NOTE: Ms. Barrett did disclose her lawsuit was dismissed and that the Institute for Justice plans to appeal the case. However, the letter below from a Clean Elections advocate is printed unedited.

In her March 21, 2005, rant against Clean Elections, Institute for Justice attorney Jennifer Barrett omits mention of her own dirty little secret.

See "2004 Election Cycle Demonstrated Dirty Secret Behind 'Clean Elections Act'"

The secret is that the lawsuit her organization filed in 2004 against Clean Elections was dismissed two weeks ago. Her arguments have been rejected. Arizona District Court Judge Earl Carroll denied the IFJ claims that matching funds granted to Clean Elections candidates infringe on the free-speech rights of opponents. Indeed, in his opinion Judge Carroll quoted a previous case: "Appellants misconstrue the meaning of the First Amendment's protection of their speech. They have no right to speak free from response..."

This marks the seventh straight defeat for those who have tried to kill Clean Elections through the courts. These folks just can't stand not being able to use large amounts of special interest money to determine who gets elected.

Clean Elections involves public campaign finance coupled with strict spending limits. The premise is that issues and ideas, not wealth, should determine our governmental leaders. Clean Elections is meant to improve the integrity of government, by reducing the influence of special-interest money, and the resulting appearance of corruption. Clean Elections also gives ordinary citizens the opportunity to seek office "without mortgaging their houses or their souls," as columnist E.J. Dionne puts it.

Campaign spending at every level has reached obscene proportions. Candidates attempt to bury their opponents in money. Clean Elections limits such spending and give participating candidates the opportunity to conduct a credible campaign. It's an idea whose time has come, in Hawaii and elsewhere.

Barbara Lubin is the Director for the Clean Elections Institute, Phoenix. She can be reached via email at mailto:barb@azclean.org


Guest Editorials...


Email To a Friend
Printable version of this story...
Hawaii's Online
Resource for Business
and Government Record

Hawaii Reporter
111 Hekili Street, Suite A, #240
Kailua, Hawaii 96734 U.S.A.

Information and Subscription
Phone: 808-524-4500
Fax: 808-524-4594
Subscribe@HawaiiReporter.com

City Desk
Phone: 808-306-3161
Fax: 808-263-8181
Tips@HawaiiReporter.com

www.HawaiiReporter.com

© 2005 Hawaii Reporter, Inc. | About Us | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Limitations of Liability